Canon EF-S 10-22mm lens
|
||||||
| Light! I need light! 04/09/2010 I have a 70-300mm and a 17-85mm. I work mostly at the 300mm end. I wanted a wide angle for those special shots. But beware the effect of the f/3.5 light limit. I also made a slight mistake by taking the 10-22mm to a wedding. I like to be unseen at weddings by using my 300mm. Can't be unseen with wide angle! Can't keep changing lenses. Perhaps I need 2 camera bodies. It is a superb lens, though. By R. Kent England | ||||||
| Mind Blowing on Canon EOS 500D 15/06/2010 I bought this lens to go with my 55-250mm and 18-55mm as we are going on a Norwegian Fjords Cruise later in the year and wanted a lens to capture the amazing scenery. From the test shots taken today I am certain that I won't be disappointed. The picture quality is outstanding. At 10mm I can also capture internal shots of rooms that give a wonderful feeling of depth. Can't fault it - I know there are cheaper lens out there but why do that to yourself? Amazing!!! By M. Jordan UK | ||||||
| Very much recommended 25/05/2010 I recommend this lenses for all architecture photography lovers! Very good equipment! By P. A. Siemaszko | ||||||
| Canon 10-22mm USM - Canon knows best... for Canon 12/04/2010 Having owned a Tamron wide angle zoom for my 5D and been very happy with it, my first instinct was to go third party and save £200 when I switched to a 40D - opting for the original Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6. I was reasonably pleased with the results until I borrowed a friend's Canon 10-22mm USM for geeking about with, and discovered that I could get about 8% more image in, corner to corner at 10mm. Literally the Canon was wider at 10mm than the Sigma... Also, slightly closer focusing meant the Canon - despite producing some fantastic straight lines at this extreme wide angle - could also produce more "odd", nearly fisheye effects when used in extreme close-ups. All in all, it gives more flexibility. When I upgraded to a 7D I went back out and tried all of the super-wide-angles from Sigma (both 10-20mms), Tamron (10-24mm) and this from Canon in a friendly local shop and once again it came out tops for resolution and range: only the new upgraded Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 came very close. In the end I opted for the Canon, got a good deal and love it. Its resolution is not quite as high as the 17-55mm IS, 70-300mm DO IS or 24-105mm L, but it's perfectly acceptable as probably few people plan to crop the hell out of a wide-angle image. Depending on your shooting style, and where you shoot you might even find that the range gives you a useful walk around as 22mm roughly equates to a 35mm lens on a 35mm SLR. By ZoomClick London, UK | ||||||
| Great lens 15/11/2009 Bought this for landscapes and haven't been disappointed. Use it on a 450D and would thoroughly recommend it. By Loubelou Scotland | ||||||
![[Explored...to Frontpage] "I always dream of flying over sahyadri..."](http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2557/3783330069_d19da29202_s.jpg)
