Canon EOS 10D

The Canon EOS 10D is a discontinued 6.3-megapixel semi-professional digital SLR camera, initially announced on February 27, 2003 at a price point of US$1,999 without lens. It replaced the EOS D60, which is also a 6.3-megapixel digital SLR camera. It was succeeded by the EOS 20D in August 2004. The 10D is the last prosumer camera to only be able to mount EF lenses; all successive cameras can also mount the EF-S lens derviative. The EOS 10D sits in the prosumer (professional-consumer) line of digital SLR cameras that Canon manufactures.

Cheapest price: $317
(across 1 store)
canon d10 brilliant camera

14/03/2005

Brilliant camera. I use mine mainly for weddings and portrait photography and it has never let me down. I am currently looking for a small compact to take with me to the beach ect and cant believe i will be paying about the same as what you can get the brilliant 10d for. I paid over a thousand a year ago and thought there must be somthing very wrong with the camera, for it to have dropped so low in price so quickly, but no it is as superb as it always has been they just bought out the new one two quick. If you are reading this and cant make up your mind on weather to buy the 10d,go for it you will not be dissapointed its a lot of camera for a very low price.

By
10/10
Superseded

22/02/2005

Sad, but that's how fast things move in the Digital world. This camera has now been replaced by the Canon 20D. As such, it's no longer worth the £800+ that Amazon have it advertised for, as I write this.

But click on the New and Used link, and I can currently see it for £400 from one of Amazon's own partners. And that's new as well; it's not a used one. That's got to be the best bargain that I've seen in a long time. You'll be paying £700 less than the 20D's cost, and for a camera that's not all that inferior to it.

Here's a quick summary of the main improvements you'd be missing by not getting the 20D:

• Increased pixel count; the 20D has 8.2 Megapixels compared to the 10D's 6.3. However, you're only ever likely to notice this if you're printing out large (bigger than A3) prints.
• Less image noise at higher ISO settings. The 20D is noticeably better at ISO 800 and higher
• Faster start up time. The 10D takes 2 or 3 seconds to start up, and this can be a major pain, especially as it puts itself into standby mode after 30 seconds or so of inactivity. (It takes those same 2 or 3 seconds to wake up from standby mode too). I don't think I've ever actually missed a shot because of this, but it's been a close thing on occasion. The 20D starts up pretty well instantaneously.
• Ability to use the Canon's EF-S lenses. This new range of digital-only lenses can, at present, be used only with the 300D and 20D. They will not fit on to the 10D! Shame, because there's some nice looking lenses in the EF-S range. 3rd party manufacturers such as Sigma have stepped in to fill this gap somewhat.

Despite these shortcomings, you'll be getting an awful lot of camera for £400. I certainly wouldn't pay much more for it now, although it was worth double that not six months ago. If you've got the money to spare, I'd still go for the 20D though.

By Michael Brown

8/10
Remarkably friendly

08/12/2004

I have a number of EOS lenses with which I'm very happy and couldn't afford to replace anyway, so when it came to choosing my first digital SLR I came back to Canon; choosing between the 300D, 10D and 20D wasn't easy, but taking a hands-on look at some shop demo models left me with the impression that while the 300D is a great camera, wonderfully affordable too for what it offers to novices in particular, the 10D and 20D both offer broader advanced features. Both are significantly more robust too, which can be important in the field (slippery fingers are a cursed thing!). Ultimately, the price of the 10D and my more modest needs won me over, and I was able to acquire the camera via the Marketplace for the same amount as a new 300D, which was thrilling.

I'm more than satisfied with its performance, and have been getting wonderful results with my most used lens, a 100mm Canon Macro f2.8. Accurate auto-focus and minimal noise even at higher ISOs seals it all for me.

By

10/10
Fun, Fast and Feels Good

21/07/2004

I've used the Canon EOS 10d for 5 months now and I'm absolutely thrilled with it. I also bought an extra battery, but have not had to use it. The battery lasts all day (at least thus far).

In auto mode, the camera produces correctly exposed, sharp photos. Unlike my Canon Powershot, the camera takes the picture with very little delay after depressing the shutter button.

In the creative zones, you can set aperture priority to take, for example, selective focus shots, or use shutter speed priority and set a slow shutter speed to take some good blurring shots.

The auto focus is quick and accurate. I never use the manual focus mode. The pop-up flash works great for lighting subject that are in shadows or back lit.

I now find it a bit frustrating to use my film camera. I'm addicted to viewing my shots on the spot. And I love being able to change lenses without having to first finish a roll or wind the film back into the spool.

I also have a Canon EOS AE film camera that I purchased in 1995. Since I'm familiar with the EOS system and have Canon system lenses, I chose the 10d over the similarly priced Nikon prosumer digital camera. The EOS cameras are extremely comfortable to hold and handle.

I like my Canon cameras so well that I bought the Canon digital Elf for my sister and the Canon Powershot A80 for my mother. Both have reportedly been excellent cameras.

With the 10d, I've used a Canon 50mm/compact macro, a Tamron 28-200mm and a Canon 15mm fisheye lens with the 10d. Because of the difference in the way a film camera and a digital camera operate, you multiply the focal length of the lens by 1.6 to figure the effective focal length when used with a digital camera. So, for example, the 15mm fisheye lens is effectively a 24mm lens on the 10d.

I bought a 1 gig IMB microdrive storage card and that allows me to take 400 high res jpg or 160 raw format photos.

Unless you need the quality of the 1Ds immediately I would recommend getting the 10D because technology is moving so fast that the quality of the 1Ds will be available for the current price of the 10D in the near future.

By Stacy Munn
Seattle, WA USA

10/10
THE DOGS DOO DAHS

16/06/2004

This camera is simply the best in its class. It does everything a serious amateur or even a pro could want.
Typical Canon. Excellent build quality. Excellent controls.
I have been using it for quite some time now and do not have a single complaint.

By Steve T
Maidenhead, England.
10/10